|
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2013 15:05:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by luhoopsfan on May 30, 2013 20:05:26 GMT -5
Someone send this to any board member that feels men's basketball success doesn't have a payoff for a school like ours
|
|
|
|
Post by jellybean on May 31, 2013 15:39:03 GMT -5
The other chart which was deleted for some reason showed a bump to lasalle.edu but not to the degree that goexplorers.com received. It was interesting to see the amount of hits that lasalle.edu received over the Summer of 2012. All those high school kids looking. Would be interesting to see the amount of hits this Summer.
|
|
|
|
Post by theneumann64 on May 31, 2013 23:57:41 GMT -5
I didn't delete anything, just so everyone knows.
|
|
|
|
Post by percydovetonsils on Jun 1, 2013 5:33:22 GMT -5
Yes but unfortunately back at the same low levels. Actually looks like you lost a few points. |
|
|
|
Post by jellybean on Jun 1, 2013 8:39:50 GMT -5
I didn't delete anything, just so everyone knows. Didn't say you did. For some reason the author edited his original two charts. Hope that clears things. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2013 20:51:44 GMT -5
Yes but unfortunately back at the same low levels. Actually looks like you lost a few points. Nope. In April 2013 vs. April 2012, hits are definitely up (hard to eyeball it, so I drew a straight line across the chart to verify this). And April is always a low demand time for NCAA sports inquiries, so don't compare it to Feb/March peak. And yes, I deleted my own post, because I suspected that the figures below were likely prone to statistical error. I will put it back up, but I just want to clarify that I got the stats from a third party, and not directly from the webmaster on campus. Therefore, I think there must have been some guesswork involved. Still, the relative volume should be reassuring.  |
|
