|
Post by jellybean on May 15, 2018 18:15:22 GMT -5
I don't think we are going for the Under 6'-6" championship. La Salle has shown interest in 7-2 McLeod , 6-9 Ingraham and 6-9 Ray Somerville (Donnie has done a lot of work here). I said nothing of height. They are all low post players.
|
|
|
Post by JoeFedorowicz on May 15, 2018 18:59:06 GMT -5
I said nothing of height. They are all low post players. I'm sure there are 5x as many players they've shown interest in. Have to show interest.
|
|
|
Post by jellybean on May 15, 2018 19:17:40 GMT -5
They are all low post players. I'm sure there are 5x as many players they've shown interest in. Have to show interest. I don't know what your arguing or trying to say but I am not biting. Take care. I mention 3 low post players that La Salle has been following for awhile and people tell me the same. They offered Somerville recently. That was announced publicly.
|
|
|
Post by JoeFedorowicz on May 15, 2018 19:23:35 GMT -5
I'm sure there are 5x as many players they've shown interest in. Have to show interest. I don't know what your arguing or trying to say but I am not biting. Take care. I mention 3 low post players that La Salle has been following for awhile and people tell me the same. They offered Somerville recently. That was announced publicly. I'm seeing La Salle as offering last July. You replied to my post. People are saying they want a low post guy. I don't think Ashley Howard is going to strongly target a low post guy based on his desire to run and shoot. That's all.
|
|
|
Post by jellybean on May 15, 2018 19:36:38 GMT -5
Somerville was offered by G in July. Ashley met with him after taking the job recently to reiterate that he also is offering Somerville a scholarship.
Ashley will definitely have low post players. He is not going to build a team entirely of shooters and guys under 6-6/6-7.
|
|
|
Post by vital on May 15, 2018 20:58:22 GMT -5
I think La Salle has 0 and not -1. There are a couple things I've heard about people leaving that haven't happened yet, but that was prior to a coaching change. Not sure who those potential transfers may be but I definitely don’t want to lose Moultrie. Not trying to pry, start rumors or take away from others on the team. Just making a statement based on his offensive abilities and year. "speculation" guessing theory maybe it could be my guy Shaggy especially the way he didn't play down the stretch or it could be Sullivan? another question mark is Pookie years of eligibility? Vistors are flocking to the program...
|
|
|
Post by diehardexplorer on May 15, 2018 21:02:13 GMT -5
Somerville was offered by G in July. Ashley met with him after taking the job recently to reiterate that he also is offering Somerville a scholarship. Ashley will definitely have low post players. He is not going to build a team entirely of shooters and guys under 6-6/6-7. link to the article confirming the above.
www.cityofbasketballlove.com/news_article/show/917392?referrer_id=1566508
|
|
|
Post by diehardexplorer on May 15, 2018 21:05:14 GMT -5
Not sure who those potential transfers may be but I definitely don’t want to lose Moultrie. Not trying to pry, start rumors or take away from others on the team. Just making a statement based on his offensive abilities and year. "speculation" guessing theory maybe it could be my guy Shaggy especially the way he didn't play down the stretch or it could be Sullivan? another question mark is Pookie years of eligibility? Vistors are flocking to the program...
i hope shaggy stays. he should be starting with a clean slate under the new coach. the kid is a talent and if he is willing to defend and play more under control, the sky's the limit. i was thinking the same thing about pookie. maybe there's an issue getting the eligibility waiver. i hope not but it wouldn't surprise me.
|
|
|
Post by mookie on May 16, 2018 6:23:51 GMT -5
"speculation" guessing theory maybe it could be my guy Shaggy especially the way he didn't play down the stretch or it could be Sullivan? another question mark is Pookie years of eligibility? Vistors are flocking to the program...
i hope shaggy stays. he should be starting with a clean slate under the new coach. the kid is a talent and if he is willing to defend and play more under control, the sky's the limit. i was thinking the same thing about pookie. maybe there's an issue getting the eligibility waiver. i hope not but it wouldn't surprise me.
I’m hoping Shaggy doesn’t transfer. His sitting out towards the end was a little concerning but the fact that he was on the bench with the team and very engaged gave me the impression there was no issue with G or the team.
|
|
|
Post by coqui900 on May 16, 2018 8:23:41 GMT -5
G said that Shaggy freshman year wasn't the best with going to class, ergo he didn't play. It could be something along those lines.
|
|
|
Post by mookie on May 16, 2018 9:03:48 GMT -5
G said that Shaggy freshman year wasn't the best with going to class, ergo he didn't play. It could be something along those lines. Wasn’t that Moultrie?
|
|
|
Post by 23won on May 16, 2018 11:31:36 GMT -5
G said that Shaggy freshman year wasn't the best with going to class, ergo he didn't play. It could be something along those lines. Wasn’t that Moultrie? We’re talkin class??? 😄
|
|
|
Post by vital on May 16, 2018 12:16:39 GMT -5
G said that Shaggy freshman year wasn't the best with going to class, ergo he didn't play. It could be something along those lines. Not Shaggy he is a double Major and i believe his GPA is around 3.7 or higher...not class related maybe Coach to Player issues and some family issues
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2018 12:27:58 GMT -5
Impressive senior 'Mix Tape' for Mr. Spencer from YouTube. He can shoot, jump and plays with attitude:
|
|
|
Post by 23won on May 16, 2018 18:18:23 GMT -5
Impressive senior 'Mix Tape' for Mr. Spencer from YouTube. He can shoot, jump and plays with attitude: Looks great. I am a big believer in recruiting players who have won state championships and been in the champ mix in multiple years.
|
|
|
Post by thelasallelunatic on May 16, 2018 21:13:14 GMT -5
G said that Shaggy freshman year wasn't the best with going to class, ergo he didn't play. It could be something along those lines. Wasn’t that Moultrie? Yes, it was Moultrie.
|
|
|
Post by explorer88 on May 16, 2018 21:15:10 GMT -5
G said it about both Moultrie and Deas.
|
|
|
Post by thelasallelunatic on May 16, 2018 21:17:53 GMT -5
My mistake coqui.
|
|
|
Post by vital on May 16, 2018 23:09:29 GMT -5
G said it about both Moultrie and Deas. only Moultrie had class issues...
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2018 23:13:14 GMT -5
Sometimes it feels like we should talk about certain subjects offline, otherwise if one googles the names it automatically might result in a hit on their attendance records from freshman year of college. But I realize I'm not the moderator, so I don't have a say on what we should be talking about. I'm just asking, can we be polite and also productive? And let some of these rumors exist offline, but not in a forum such as ours where we are supposed to not talk about these things?
|
|
|
Post by explorer88 on May 17, 2018 5:54:59 GMT -5
G said it about both Moultrie and Deas. only Moultrie had class issues... G never said Deas had class issues. He said he and Moultrie has to adjust to the rigors of college life. That is all I heard him say.
|
|
|
Post by JoeFedorowicz on May 17, 2018 6:24:47 GMT -5
Sometimes it feels like we should talk about certain subjects offline, otherwise if one googles the names it automatically might result in a hit on their attendance records from freshman year of college. But I realize I'm not the moderator, so I don't have a say on what we should be talking about. I'm just asking, can we be polite and also productive? And let some of these rumors exist offline, but not in a forum such as ours where we are supposed to not talk about these things? These are a step closer to the line, but not over it. Not wildly speculative and based off what the coach said publicly. Once we cross that line, per our rules, it’ll be moderated.
|
|
|
Post by coachd on May 17, 2018 10:49:08 GMT -5
Sometimes it feels like we should talk about certain subjects offline, otherwise if one googles the names it automatically might result in a hit on their attendance records from freshman year of college. But I realize I'm not the moderator, so I don't have a say on what we should be talking about. I'm just asking, can we be polite and also productive? And let some of these rumors exist offline, but not in a forum such as ours where we are supposed to not talk about these things?
|
|