|
Post by Fastchuck on Mar 8, 2016 17:34:04 GMT -5
How about every national poll that suggests Bernie (or Hillary for that matter) have fairly sizeable leads against any of those 3? I don't think the polls of right now will matter in a couple of months or more importantly in November. Even if Hillary isn't indicted the non-partisan FBI report (probable release by June) and the bi-partisan Benghazi Committee report (probable release this month) will show even more clearly that Hillary's testimony vs. her e-mails doesn't match up which equals perjury. Even the most loyal folks in politics don't like those in their own party who blatantly lie about important issues. A crook is a crook. Just like Nixon in Watergate, Hillary will be faced with very serious charges and/or public pressure and this will put an end to her political career. What will happen when Trump losses the fraud suit(s)currently pending over Trump University. Voters don't like politicians who blatantly lie. Could we be faced with a November choice between 2 crooks?
|
|
|
Post by coachd on Mar 8, 2016 20:19:19 GMT -5
I don't think the polls of right now will matter in a couple of months or more importantly in November. Even if Hillary isn't indicted the non-partisan FBI report (probable release by June) and the bi-partisan Benghazi Committee report (probable release this month) will show even more clearly that Hillary's testimony vs. her e-mails doesn't match up which equals perjury. Even the most loyal folks in politics don't like those in their own party who blatantly lie about important issues. A crook is a crook. Just like Nixon in Watergate, Hillary will be faced with very serious charges and/or public pressure and this will put an end to her political career. What will happen when Trump losses the fraud suit(s)currently pending over Trump University. Voters don't like politicians who blatantly lie. Could we be faced with a November choice between 2 crooks? Lol! Trump University is a minor lawsuit that Trump will most likely win... No proof he lied and no FBI investigation. You do understand that Hillary is in grave danger as she has severe national security violations. This is far more serious than Watergate. Many Democrats think she got by the Benghazi Committtee but she perjured herself. Emails prove this beyond any reasonable doubt. The FBI has over 170 agents investigating her. What is the likelihood they find nothing on Hillary? Remember General Petraues was a hero of the Iraq war and he was prosecuted for far less. Federal Judge Sullivan, appointed by Bill Clinton, is not the drive-by media. He isn't going to let her escape justice nor let the State Dept or DOJ drag their feet. Watchdog groups are also not going to let things slide.
|
|
|
Post by JoeFedorowicz on Mar 8, 2016 20:35:29 GMT -5
What will happen when Trump losses the fraud suit(s)currently pending over Trump University. Voters don't like politicians who blatantly lie. Could we be faced with a November choice between 2 crooks? Remember General Petraues was a hero of the Iraq war and he was prosecuted for far less. He hand an affair with an author of his biography, sharing classified and top-secret information with her. Far less?
|
|
|
Post by SICguy84 on Mar 8, 2016 20:49:35 GMT -5
Hearing and seeing Ted Cruz gives me the same feeling I get when I see a SJU of Penna. person.
|
|
MisterD
The Baptist Himself
Voted Most Popular Poster 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2023
Posts: 8,527
Likes: 6,407
|
Post by MisterD on Mar 8, 2016 21:49:02 GMT -5
... over 100 FBI agents criminally investigating ... The FBI has over 170 agents investigating her. Steve, did you ever respond to my question at the bottom of the first page, bud?
|
|
|
Post by coachd on Mar 8, 2016 21:52:14 GMT -5
Remember General Petraues was a hero of the Iraq war and he was prosecuted for far less. He hand an affair with an author of his biography, sharing classified and top-secret information with her. Far less? You do realize Hillary had an illegal unsecured server containing hundreds of top secret national security info. Some was so secret that most of the FBI agents didn't have clearance to read it. She also destroyed evidence by deleting emails which were recovered by IT forensics. Also she shared this secret info with Sid Blumenthal, a non- cleared person outside the govt. She also hired Huma Abedin illegally. You can do further research if you are interested. Each felony carries a minimum 5 year sentence. Whether it's Nixon deleting 18 minutes of recordings or Hillary deleting 30,000+ emails... A crook is a crook. There is no escape from justice as no one is above the law.
|
|
|
Post by JoeFedorowicz on Mar 8, 2016 21:58:45 GMT -5
I love people who make claims and then say 'do the research.' It's your job to prove your point.
|
|
|
Post by durenduren on Mar 8, 2016 22:35:48 GMT -5
... over 100 FBI agents criminally investigating ... The FBI has over 170 agents investigating her. Steve, did you ever respond to my question at the bottom of the first page, bud? He's, like, really really really going out of his way to ignore you.
|
|
|
Post by durenduren on Mar 8, 2016 22:39:21 GMT -5
Hearing and seeing Ted Cruz... All I can think when he speaks...
|
|
MisterD
The Baptist Himself
Voted Most Popular Poster 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2023
Posts: 8,527
Likes: 6,407
|
Post by MisterD on Mar 8, 2016 22:50:58 GMT -5
He's, like, really really really going out of his way to ignore you. So weird, isn't it? Maybe he just hasn't seen the question any of those three times.
|
|
|
Post by a10champion15 on Mar 9, 2016 0:24:16 GMT -5
I really don't know who is more outta their mind Cruz or Trump.
Kasich is the only electable candidate for republicans but stands close to no chance. Don't know what republicans are doing even bothering with 4 candidates this late.
I cannot wait till this Bernie nonsense is over. He isn't beating Hillary.
|
|
|
Post by thelasallelunatic on Mar 9, 2016 6:43:04 GMT -5
Being the gambler that I am... I put $100 on Trump to win the Presidential election last summer, he was +800 back then. Note he's at +150. I don't know if he's going to win, but I KNOW it was a great value bet. A math guy like Mr D can see that.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2016 7:26:59 GMT -5
I really don't know who is more outta their mind Cruz or Trump. Kasich is the only electable candidate for republicans but stands close to no chance. Don't know what republicans are doing even bothering with 4 candidates this late. I cannot wait till this Bernie nonsense is over. He isn't beating Hillary. If Kasich had a vote for every time I saw that statement... he's gained a whole lot of momentum, double digits, in the last two weeks while Cruz and Rubio have actually been flat or lost votes. Winning places like Idaho and Puerto Rico keeps the establishment anti-Trump candidates in the news cycle, but Kasich only lost to Cruz in Michigan by 0.6% of the vote. He's not just hurting Cruz, he's stealing delegates from the inevitable Trump majority. Kasich "won" the last debate according to undecided voters which I say with a grain of salt because the win/loss criteria are very subjective. CNN last night reiterated the truth which is that the only way Trump doesn't win the nomination is if either Rubio holds ground in Fla and/or Kasich takes Ohio and even if they don't win those states, these candidates will still help in staving off a Trump default win by preventing him from running away with ALL the delegates. When Trump breaks 50% in a given state, he can take ALL the delegates but if he wins 49% and Kasich/Cruz take low 20's each, the delegates get split up, forcing Trumpf to keep campaigning to the end.
|
|
|
Post by coachd on Mar 9, 2016 9:37:05 GMT -5
I love people who make claims and then say 'do the research.' It's your job to prove your point. I never said "do the research"; I gave you the background information which is what will be used to bring indictment recommendations by the FBI when they release their report. I said you can "do further research" by researching Federal Judge Sullivan (who was appointed by Bill Clinton) who is demanding answers. You will discover that Hillary sent e-mails containing top secret information to Sidney Blumenthal who was never a government employee nor did he have any govt clearance. Blumenthal was giving advice to Hillary as Sec of State. You can read about how Huma Abedin (Anthony Weiner's wife) and Hillary's most trusted advisor was illegally hired. Watchdog groups are also not going to let this end without having all of the facts released since this pertains to National Security. We have a right to know this information which is why the Freedom Of Information Act is so important in keeping govt officials from deviating from the law. We have a Constitution that must be followed.
|
|
|
Post by coachd on Mar 9, 2016 9:45:38 GMT -5
I really don't know who is more outta their mind Cruz or Trump. Kasich is the only electable candidate for republicans but stands close to no chance. Don't know what republicans are doing even bothering with 4 candidates this late. I cannot wait till this Bernie nonsense is over. He isn't beating Hillary. Trump or Cruz will crush Hillary or Bernie. Hillary still has to face the non-partisan FBI report and the bi-partisan Benghazi Committee report. The Republicans have 4 candidates because they don't have a coronation like the Dems did with Hillary (or attempted to do... Bernie surprised Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and the DNC). Hillary and Bill will never be in the White House again... the national security felonies and the quid pro quo deals with the Clinton Foundation (including foreigner George Soros) will finally bring an end to the Clinton Crime family.
|
|
MisterD
The Baptist Himself
Voted Most Popular Poster 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2023
Posts: 8,527
Likes: 6,407
|
Post by MisterD on Mar 9, 2016 9:58:50 GMT -5
Hey CoachD (just so we can avoid the "I'm not Steve" thing) ... really hoping you can respond to my question at the bottom of page one. Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by thelasallelunatic on Mar 9, 2016 10:24:25 GMT -5
Cruz WILL NOT win a national election. A flat tax will not work for this country.
|
|
|
Post by durenduren on Mar 9, 2016 10:42:14 GMT -5
Hey CoachD (just so we can avoid the "I'm not Steve" thing) ... really hoping you can respond to my question at the bottom of page one. Thanks! MisterD right about now...
|
|
MisterD
The Baptist Himself
Voted Most Popular Poster 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2023
Posts: 8,527
Likes: 6,407
|
Post by MisterD on Mar 9, 2016 11:35:02 GMT -5
Thanks for cropping out the tear-filled eyes.
|
|
|
Post by durenduren on Mar 9, 2016 11:40:23 GMT -5
Thanks for cropping out the tear-filled eyes. Distance will only make the heart grow fonder... Right, Steve?
|
|
|
Post by JoeFedorowicz on Mar 9, 2016 11:46:23 GMT -5
I love people who make claims and then say 'do the research.' It's your job to prove your point. I never said "do the research"; I gave you the background information which is what will be used to bring indictment recommendations by the FBI when they release their report. I said you can "do further research" by researching Federal Judge Sullivan (who was appointed by Bill Clinton) who is demanding answers. You will discover that Hillary sent e-mails containing top secret information to Sidney Blumenthal who was never a government employee nor did he have any govt clearance. Blumenthal was giving advice to Hillary as Sec of State. You can read about how Huma Abedin (Anthony Weiner's wife) and Hillary's most trusted advisor was illegally hired. Watchdog groups are also not going to let this end without having all of the facts released since this pertains to National Security. We have a right to know this information which is why the Freedom Of Information Act is so important in keeping govt officials from deviating from the law. We have a Constitution that must be followed. Background information must be cited. You said:
|
|
|
Post by coachd on Mar 9, 2016 14:38:59 GMT -5
I never said "do the research"; I gave you the background information which is what will be used to bring indictment recommendations by the FBI when they release their report. I said you can "do further research" by researching Federal Judge Sullivan (who was appointed by Bill Clinton) who is demanding answers. You will discover that Hillary sent e-mails containing top secret information to Sidney Blumenthal who was never a government employee nor did he have any govt clearance. Blumenthal was giving advice to Hillary as Sec of State. You can read about how Huma Abedin (Anthony Weiner's wife) and Hillary's most trusted advisor was illegally hired. Watchdog groups are also not going to let this end without having all of the facts released since this pertains to National Security. We have a right to know this information which is why the Freedom Of Information Act is so important in keeping govt officials from deviating from the law. We have a Constitution that must be followed. Background information must be cited. You said: Be careful what you ask for... www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/03/09/rnc-hillary-clinton-email-lawsuit-sean-spicer-ath.cnn
|
|
MisterD
The Baptist Himself
Voted Most Popular Poster 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2023
Posts: 8,527
Likes: 6,407
|
Post by MisterD on Mar 9, 2016 14:43:09 GMT -5
Hey man, wasn't sure if you saw any of my notes above.
|
|
|
Post by durenduren on Mar 9, 2016 14:56:55 GMT -5
Hey man, wasn't sure if you saw any of my notes above.
|
|
|
Post by JoeFedorowicz on Mar 9, 2016 15:37:36 GMT -5
You cited data that was released a day after you said it? That's a neat trick. And that video says nothing except that some Republicans are suing the State Department for Hillary's coworkers' emails. Not what you said.
|
|
|
Post by calsufan on Mar 9, 2016 19:31:07 GMT -5
You cited data that was released a day after you said it? That's a neat trick. And that video says nothing except that some Republicans are suing the State Department for Hillary's coworkers' emails. Not what you said. I think what that shows you is that Steve still has incredible pull. He was able to place a story with a national news source. Who else could do that, but Steve? This is similar to when he and his buddy the Cos were taking their coterie of lawyers to March on Linda Bruno's offices.
|
|
|
Post by a10champion15 on Mar 9, 2016 22:03:24 GMT -5
I would not vouch for how awesome Hillary is. She is a politician and is slimy like the rest. I don't really like her that much at all. I would choose Biden over her anyday of the week in terms of democratic nominees. Sanders is similar to Cruz as his options are the extremes of his party. I have no time for extremists whether they are on the right or left.
One of the biggest things that people like about Hillary is who she is married too. People trust Bill. I trusted and still trust Bill. That factor isn't going to change anytime soon no matter what incidents people want to make more of an issue whether it's benghazi or frigin emails the man she married was a damn good president.
Hillary will win this election and it won't be close if Trump/Cruz is the nominee. The republican party has an identity problem right now. My guess is though Hillary's term will only be 4 years.
|
|
|
Post by thelasallelunatic on Mar 10, 2016 10:38:48 GMT -5
Hillary will win this election and it won't be close if Trump/Cruz is the nominee. The republican party has an identity problem right now. My guess is though Hillary's term will only be 4 years. Wanna Bet???
|
|
|
Post by coqui900 on Mar 10, 2016 13:22:29 GMT -5
The thing most upsetting about me to our election right now is just the grotesque media conflicts-of-interest that are going on. To wit:
1) Univision hosted the debate last night, I believe? Their owners are giant Hilary backers. So are Time Warner's.
2) Andrea Mitchell hosted one of the NBC DNC debates. Her husband is ex-Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan. She then asked questions about economic policy. To Bernie Sanders, who grilled the f out of her husband ages ago. Also, Mitchell is an embed reporter with Team Hilary. I'm sure she's breaking all sorts of dirt.
3) I have to dig up the article but somewhere really reputable just wrote something about how all of these pundits that go on the airwaves are introduced as things like "an-ex Obama adviser" and the like but are straight up on the Clinton campaign payroll. And that part is completely ignored during their introductions.
These things are so gross to me. I used to be a reporter for some really dumpy weekly newspapers. I wouldn't even take a can of soda when doing a puff piece on the local Boy Scout troop because of objectivity purposes.
Like... how can we possibly be okay with this? I'm not a conspiracy guy or a radical. I'm pretty much politically completely middle-of-the-road or even lean more to the right.
|
|
|
Post by thelasallelunatic on Mar 10, 2016 14:08:20 GMT -5
The thing most upsetting about me to our election right now is just the grotesque media conflicts-of-interest that are going on. To wit: 1) Univision hosted the debate last night, I believe? Their owners are giant Hilary backers. So are Time Warner's. 2) Andrea Mitchell hosted one of the NBC DNC debates. Her husband is ex-Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan. She then asked questions about economic policy. To Bernie Sanders, who grilled the f out of her husband ages ago. Also, Mitchell is an embed reporter with Team Hilary. I'm sure she's breaking all sorts of dirt. 3) I have to dig up the article but somewhere really reputable just wrote something about how all of these pundits that go on the airwaves are introduced as things like "an-ex Obama adviser" and the like but are straight up on the Clinton campaign payroll. And that part is completely ignored during their introductions. These things are so gross to me. I used to be a reporter for some really dumpy weekly newspapers. I wouldn't even take a can of soda when doing a puff piece on the local Boy Scout troop because of objectivity purposes. Like... how can we possibly be okay with this? I'm not a conspiracy guy or a radical. I'm pretty much politically completely middle-of-the-road or even lean more to the right. I agree
|
|